From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thrash v. White

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 4, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09cv00095 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:09cv00095 BSM.

June 4, 2010


ORDER


The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the objections filed by plaintiffs Anthony and Jean Thrash have been reviewed. After a de novo review and careful consideration of the entire record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted with regard to plaintiffs' free association, due process, and cruel and unusual punishment claims. Plaintiffs' equal protection claim, however, will not be dismissed as recommended by Judge Young because, in their objections, plaintiffs presented evidence supporting their claim.

Accordingly, summary judgment is granted as to plaintiffs' free association, due process, and cruel and unusual punishment claims, and these claims are dismissed with prejudice. Summary judgment is denied as to the equal protection claim and the case is referred to Magistrate Judge Young for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether there is any merit to plaintiffs' claim that there are similarly situated individuals who are treated differently than plaintiffs.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Thrash v. White

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 4, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09cv00095 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Thrash v. White

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY THRASH, ADC #94228, and JEAN THRASH PLAINTIFFS v. DAVID WHITE, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 5:09cv00095 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2010)