In re Blundy, 2012 WL 4506663, at *10 (citing In re Protos, 2005 WL 6491916; In re Mercier, 328 B.R. 590). Thors v. Allen, No. 16-2224, 2016 WL 7326076, at *10 (D.N.J. Dec. 16, 2016); In re Protos, 2005 WL 6491916, at *2. Here, none of the challenged texts and emails even hint at collecting a prepetition debt.

The Court is confident that by exercising its discretion to allow the Movants to liquidate their claims in State Court while ordering them to refrain from executing on any judgments without further relief from this Court, prejudice to the estate and other creditors will be minimized.SeeMatter of Holtkamp, 669 F.2d 505, 508 (7th Cir. 1982) (affirming order allowing unsecured creditor to continue state court litigation in part because the order prohibited unsecured creditor from enforcing judgment); Thors v. Allen, Civ. Nos. 16-2224 (RMB), 2016 WL 7326076, at *5, 8 (D. N.J. Dec. 16, 2016) (affirming order granting relief for creditor to continue action in state court to determine parties' rights to a lease but preventing creditor from taking any action to enforce state court order without further relief from bankruptcy court); In re Boltz-Rubinstein, Civ. No. 10-7099, 2011 WL 13196622, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2011) (affirming order modifying the automatic stay to permit unsecured creditor to continue prosecution of district court action so long as no execution against Debtor issued on any money judgment absent further relief from bankruptcy court); In re Pro Football Weekly, Inc., 60 B.R. 824, 827 (N.D. Ill. 1986) (granted stay relief to unsecured creditor to prosecute counterclaim in state court but not collect on any judgment); O'Neal Steel, 465 B.R. at 61 (granting stay relief to unsecured creditors to continue district court litigation where they agreed they would not attempt to enforce a judgment); In re Chan, 355 B.R. at 501 (noting bankruptcy court may perm