From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorpe v. Ingram

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
Jan 25, 2013
C.A. No: 97C-02-016 (RBY) (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 25, 2013)

Opinion

C.A. No: 97C-02-016 (RBY)

01-25-2013

BETTY THORPE Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM P. INGRAM and MARGARET ANNE INGRAM Defendants.

Noel E. Primos, Esq., Schmittinger & Rodriguez, Dover, Delaware for Plaintiff. William P. Ingram and Margaret Anne Ingram, Pro Se.


Upon Consideration of Defendants

Motion for Re-Argument

DENIED


ORDER

Noel E. Primos, Esq., Schmittinger & Rodriguez, Dover, Delaware for Plaintiff. William P. Ingram and Margaret Anne Ingram, Pro Se. Young, J.

The Court has reviewed Defendants' Motion for Re-Argument on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition. For the reasons expressed in Plaintiff's Response , Defendants' Motion for Re-Argument is DENIED.

Robert B. Young

J.
RBY/lmc
oc: Prothonotary
cc: Opinion Distribution

Noel Primos, Esq.

William P. and Margaret Anne Ingram


Summaries of

Thorpe v. Ingram

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
Jan 25, 2013
C.A. No: 97C-02-016 (RBY) (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Thorpe v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:BETTY THORPE Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM P. INGRAM and MARGARET ANNE INGRAM…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

Date published: Jan 25, 2013

Citations

C.A. No: 97C-02-016 (RBY) (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 25, 2013)