From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorp v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00206-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00206-PAB-KLM

08-29-2011

EDWARD DAVIS THORP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 10]. On August 26, 2011, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Docket No. 21] pursuant to the Minute Order [Docket No. 20] granting plaintiff's Motion to File Amended Complaint [Docket No. 18]. Thus, the Amended Complaint became the operative pleading in this action, and the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 10] is directed to an inoperative, superseded pleading. See, e.g., Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990) ("a pleading that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the pleading it modifies") (internal quotation marks omitted). As such, the motion to dismiss is moot. It is

ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 10] is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Thorp v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00206-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Thorp v. United States

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD DAVIS THORP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00206-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2011)