From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Winpenny

City Court of New York — General Term
Dec 1, 1894
10 Misc. 791 (N.Y. City Ct. 1894)

Opinion

December, 1894.

Perkins Butler, for appellant.

Brigham Baylis, for respondent.


The amended exception to the decision of the referee brings up but one question for review.

The referee decided that the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant, between the 1st day of May and the 15th of June, 1893, rendered services to the defendant in selling goods, wares and merchandise for him.

To this decision the defendant excepted as against the weight of evidence.

We think there was sufficient evidence in the case to warrant the conclusion of the referee, and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Present: VAN WYCK, CONLAN and FITZSIMONS, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Thornton v. Winpenny

City Court of New York — General Term
Dec 1, 1894
10 Misc. 791 (N.Y. City Ct. 1894)
Case details for

Thornton v. Winpenny

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD D. THORNTON, Respondent, v . L. BALTON WINPENNY, Appellant

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1894

Citations

10 Misc. 791 (N.Y. City Ct. 1894)