From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 6, 2012
No. CIV S-11-0875 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0875 EFB P

04-06-2012

WADE THORNTON, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG WEST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On January 4, 2012, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. The dismissal order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint may result in this action being dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

______________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thornton v. West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 6, 2012
No. CIV S-11-0875 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Thornton v. West

Case Details

Full title:WADE THORNTON, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG WEST, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 6, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0875 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2012)