From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 8, 2003
114 S.W.3d 167 (Ark. 2003)

Opinion

CR 03-374

Opinion delivered May 8, 2003

1. APPEAL ERROR — COURT REPORTERS — CERTIFICATION REQUIRED. — A record cannot be accepted by the supreme court clerk as a true, accurate, and complete record, where the court reporter who completed it was not licensed and, therefore, could not certify it as such; transcripts from an unlicensed court reporter should be rejected.

2. APPEAL ERROR — TRANSCRIPT MADE BY UNLICENSED REPORTER — IN CRIMINAL CASES CLERK MAY ACCEPT TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED ATTORNEYS OF RECORD CERTIFY THAT TRANSCRIPT IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE. — In criminal cases, the supreme court may direct the supreme court clerk to accept a transcript from an unlicensed court reporter, provided the attorneys of record will certify to the clerk, by affidavit, their statements that the transcript is true, accurate and complete.

3. APPEAL ERROR — TRANSCRIPT TO BE ACCEPTED UPON FULFILLMENT OF CONDITIONS — MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL WILL THEN BE GRANTED. — Upon receipt of affidavits certifying accuracy of the transcript, the supreme court clerk was directed to accept the transcript and withdraw the writ of certiorari; following acceptance by the clerk of the transcript, appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw as attorney of record, will be granted, and other counsel appointed.

Record Accepted for Filing Upon Condition of Affidavits Being Filed.

Cymber L. Tadlock, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant, Marvin L. Thornton, filed a motion for writ of certiorari to complete the record, then withdrew the motion when the record was completed and tendered by former court reporter, Iris Brooks. The attorney for Mr. Thornton, Cymber L. Tadlock, requests that the court relieve her as attorney of record. The motion to withdraw the writ of certiorari and the motion to withdraw as attorney of record will be granted upon the performance of the conditions set out in this order.

On April 5, 2003, a hearing was held before the Arkansas Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners concerning Ms. Brooks's untimely completion of the record in another case. See Hamilton v. Jones, 351 Ark. 561, 95 S.W.3d 809 (2003). At that hearing, her license was revoked. On April 8, 2003, Ms. Tadlock filed a writ of certiorari to complete the record on behalf of her client. On April 24, 2003, Ms. Tadlock filed a motion to withdraw the writ of certiorari, explaining that Ms. Brooks had tendered her portion of the record to her. At that time, Ms. Tadlock also filed a motion to be relieved as counsel.

[1-3] The first issue before this court is whether the record can be accepted by our clerk as a true, accurate, and complete record, notwithstanding that the court reporter who completed it was not licensed and, therefore, could not certify it as such. We have previously held that our clerk was correct in rejecting a transcript from an unlicensed court reporter. See Pullan v. Fulbright, 285 Ark. 152, 685 S.W.2d 151 (1985). However, in criminal cases, we may direct the supreme court clerk to accept the transcript, provided the attorneys of record will certify to the clerk, by affidavit, their statements that the transcript is true, accurate and complete. Mitchell v. State, 345 Ark. 359, 45 S.W.3d 846 (2001). Upon receipt of the affidavits certifying the accuracy of the transcript, we direct our clerk to accept the transcript and withdraw the writ of certiorari. Following the acceptance by our clerk of the transcript, we will grant Ms. Tadlock's motion to withdraw as attorney of record, and appoint Mr. Greg Knutson as attorney for this appeal.

CORBIN, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Thornton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 8, 2003
114 S.W.3d 167 (Ark. 2003)
Case details for

Thornton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marvin L. THORNTON v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: May 8, 2003

Citations

114 S.W.3d 167 (Ark. 2003)
114 S.W.3d 167