From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Harmon

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 11, 2010
5:09CV00110 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jun. 11, 2010)

Opinion

5:09CV00110 BSM/JTR.

June 11, 2010


ORDER


The court has received the recommended disposition from United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Doc. No. 57) and plaintiff Billy Thornton, Jr.'s response (Doc. No. 59). After carefully reviewing the recommended disposition, Thornton's response, and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects in its entirety.

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 48) is GRANTED, and Thornton's claims are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. Further, it is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thornton v. Harmon

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jun 11, 2010
5:09CV00110 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jun. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Thornton v. Harmon

Case Details

Full title:BILLY THORNTON, JR. ADC #89174 PLAINTIFF v. GREG HARMON, Warden, East…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jun 11, 2010

Citations

5:09CV00110 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jun. 11, 2010)