From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
No. C 11-05091 CW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-05091 CW (PR)

10-27-2011

WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS DUPLICATIVE; DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Docket no. 2)

Petitioner, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the Correctional Training Facility at Soledad (CTF), filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging conditions of his parole that require him to register as a sex offender. Specifically, Petitioner, who currently is in custody because of a violation of parole terms set in connection with a conviction obtained in the San Diego County Superior Court, maintains that he should not be required to register as a sex offender because such requirement is based on an expired 1990 Tennessee conviction for domestic violence.

Although not mentioned in the petition, the Court takes judicial notice of records from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, where Petitioner currently has several habeas corpus actions pending. In particular, the Court takes judicial notice of Thornton v. Strainer, Case No. C 11-00190 LAB (JMA), filed by Petitioner in the Southern District on January 27, 2011, in which Petitioner challenges the Tennessee conviction and the California requirement that he register as a sex offender. Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, is the respondent in that petition and, as of October 24, 2011, the petition has been fully briefed.

Additionally, the Court takes judicial notice of Thornton v. Strainer, Case No. C 11-01485 BEN (WMc), filed by Petitioner in the Southern District on July 1, 2011, in which Petitioner similarly challenged the sex offender registration requirement. That case was dismissed on July 20, 2011, as duplicative of C 11-00190.

Because it is clear that Petitioner currently is pursuing in the Southern District the same claims he raises in the instant petition, this petition is DISMISSED as duplicative.

Additionally, because Petitioner has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the Southern District, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this action is DENIED as moot. No filing fee is due.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file.

This Order terminates Docket no. 2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLAUDIA WILKEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON, Plaintiff,

v.

MATTHEW CATE et al, Defendant.

Case Number: CV11-05091 CW

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

That on October 27, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

William Cecil Thornton V64547

Correctional Training Facility

P.O. Box 705

Soledad, CA 93960

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Thornton v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
No. C 11-05091 CW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Thornton v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-05091 CW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)