Opinion
CIV-S-05-2226 FCD GGH PS.
April 26, 2007
ORDER
On March 9, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 9, 2007, are ADOPTED;
2. The motions to dismiss filed by defendant Solano County on October 12, 2006, and by defendant Sacramento County on November 15, 2006, are granted;
3. Defendant Chriss Duenas and this action in its entirety is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.