From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorne v. Ramirez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 1977
346 So. 2d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-2366.

May 24, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Harold Vann, J.

Charles D. Barnard, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Wayne, Genden Bach, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


Plaintiffs' complaint sought to hold the parents of an emancipated child liable for the child's intentional tort. There was no allegation that the child was dependent, insane or mentally deficient. The complaint was properly dismissed. As to the fact that a twenty year old child is not a minor see Hanley v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 334 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1976). It is well settled that a parent is not liable for the torts of his child simply because of his paternity. Bullock v. Armstrong, 180 So.2d 479 (Fla.2d DCA 1965). See also cases cited at 59 Am.Jur.2d Parent and Child § 130.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thorne v. Ramirez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 1977
346 So. 2d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Thorne v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIANNA THORNE, ETC., APPELLANTS, v. DR. ANTONIO RAMIREZ ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 24, 1977

Citations

346 So. 2d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Thibeault v. Seifert

In no event could that burden be discharged by merely showing the parent-child relationship, and particularly…

Knight v. Merhige

Carney, 751 So.2d at 654. Appellant Sitton posits that Carney left open the possibility “that parents of an…