From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

THORNE v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC. TEA CO., INC

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 1, 2010
488 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 140933.

October 1, 2010.

Court of Appeals No. 281906.


Order Granting Oral Argument in Case Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal Entered.

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers:

The Michigan Association for Justice and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc. are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


I concur in the Court's order that oral argument be heard on the application in this case. I write separately only to request that the parties address, at least, the following issues: (1) specifically, the means by which to distinguish under these facts between an ordinary negligence and a premises liability claim, see James v. Alberts, 464 Mich. 12 (2001), and (2) specifically, whether, and in what manner, the "open and obvious" doctrine operates in the context of each of these claims.

CORRIGAN, J., joined the statement of MAEKMAN, J.


Summaries of

THORNE v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC. TEA CO., INC

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 1, 2010
488 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

THORNE v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC. TEA CO., INC

Case Details

Full title:THORNE v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC. TEA COMPANY, INCORPORATED

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 1, 2010

Citations

488 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2010)