From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorne-El v. State Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 16, 2011
446 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6636

09-16-2011

T. THORNE-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.

T. Thorne-El, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03069-FL)

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

T. Thorne-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

T. Thorne-El appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. Because Thorne-El may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Thorne-El v. State Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 16, 2011
446 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Thorne-El v. State Carolina

Case Details

Full title:T. THORNE-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

446 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Pujari v. Virginia Polytechnical Inst.

Any attempt to amend the complaint should reflect those realities. See Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 427…