From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorn v. Sebelius

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 14, 2012
465 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2012)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that neither a counseling letter nor a change to a new scheduling system constituted an adverse employment action

Summary of this case from Watson v. Va. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs.
See 7 Summaries

Opinion

No. 11-1189

02-14-2012

DWIGHT W. THORN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant - Appellee.

Donna Beasley, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:10-cv-00299-DKC) Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donna Beasley, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dwight W. Thorn appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on each of his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Thorn v. Sebelius, No. 8:10-cv-00299-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Summaries of

Thorn v. Sebelius

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 14, 2012
465 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2012)

holding that neither a counseling letter nor a change to a new scheduling system constituted an adverse employment action

Summary of this case from Watson v. Va. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs.

holding that retaliatory emails, a change in plaintiff's tour of duty, an instruction to an employee not to work with plaintiff, unwarranted reprimands, and exclusion from a work project were not actionable adverse employment actions

Summary of this case from Stennis v. Bowie State Univ.

holding that allegations of harassment including denial of transfer requests and removal from certain duties failed to establish a claim of retaliatory hostile work environment, and instead "amount[ed] to instances where [plaintiff] disagreed with the management style or decisions of those who supervised him—and that alone is not actionable under Title VII."

Summary of this case from Brady v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George's Cnty.

holding that, under Title VII, a counseling letter that did not actually implement any discipline did not constitute an adverse employment action

Summary of this case from Stroud v. Greystar Mgmt. Servs., LP

recognizing that acts that carry a “significant risk of humiliation” may be considered an adverse employment action in the retaliation context

Summary of this case from Williams v. Silver Spring Volunteer Fire Dep't

stating that a salary employee required to work more hours with no change in pay may be subject to an adverse employment action because there was an effective pay cut

Summary of this case from Vedula v. Azar

removing an employee from a schedule that would allow him to pick up his children from school was not an adverse action

Summary of this case from Walker v. GlaxoSmithKline
Case details for

Thorn v. Sebelius

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT W. THORN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

465 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Pritchard v. Metro. Wash. Airports Auth.

In that regard, the alleged retaliatory harassment does not rise above the level of workplace "slights,"…

Engler v. Harris Corp.

Id. Further, a supervisor's strict management style or degree of supervision is not evidence of actionable…

61 Citing Cases