From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomure v. Lamb

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 3, 2000
28 S.W.3d 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77158

Filed: October 3, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE MAURA B. MCSHANE

William R. Stahlhuth, Mark T. Rudder and Steve Wolf, 187 Eureka Towne Center Drive, Eureka, MO 63025, for appellant.

Doreen A. Graham, Brian D. Winer, Robyn G. Fox, Catherine M. Vale, St. Louis, for Thomas Lipsitz.

Raymond R. Fournie, Ann E. Buckley, St. louis, for Gerry Lamb.

G. N. Beckemeier, Jr. Robert S. Sanderson, St. Louis, for Craig Voorhees.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.


ORDER

Edward and Linda Thomure (collectively "Thomure") appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Defendants Gerry Lamb, Dr. Thomas Lipsitz and Dr. Craig Voorhees ("Defendants") in their action alleging professional negligence and fraudulent misrepresentation. Thomure asserts six points of error pertaining to the giving and exclusion of instructions and the admission and exclusion of certain evidence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Thomure v. Lamb

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 3, 2000
28 S.W.3d 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Thomure v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:LINDA THOMURE, et al., Appellants v. GERRY LAMB, et al., Respondents

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 3, 2000

Citations

28 S.W.3d 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)