From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomson v. Walker

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jan 26, 2012
NO. 01-04-01294-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-04-01294-CV

01-26-2012

B. JOE THOMSON, Appellant v. ROBERT F. WALKER AND WILLIAM VINCENT WALKER, Appellees


On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2001-47514


MEMORANDUM OPINION

We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. On May 18, 2005, we abated this case because appellant, who was a defendant in the trial court, filed a suggestion of bankruptcy. On October 28, 2011, we advised the parties that the Court had learned from the bankruptcy court's information service that the bankruptcy case was ordered closed on September 13, 2010 and that, unless a party to the appeal filed a motion to retain by November 28, 2011, the appeal would be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution. A motion to retain has not been filed.

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal on our active docket, and we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.


Summaries of

Thomson v. Walker

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jan 26, 2012
NO. 01-04-01294-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Thomson v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:B. JOE THOMSON, Appellant v. ROBERT F. WALKER AND WILLIAM VINCENT WALKER…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-04-01294-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)