Opinion
2012-1536
09-14-2012
THOMSON LICENSING SAS and THOMSON LICENSING, LLC, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND QISDA CORPORATION, QISDA AMERICA CORPORATION, QISDA (SUZHOU) CO., LTD., BENQ CORPORATION, BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION, AND BENQ LATIN AMERICA CORPORATION, Interveners, AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Intervenors, AND CHIMEIINNOLUX CORPORATION, INNOLUX CORPORATION, AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., Intervenors.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation Nos. 337-TA-741 and 337-TA-749.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Qisda Corporation, Qisda America Corporation, Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Benq Corporation, Benq America Corporation, Benq Latin America Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation of America, and Chimei Innolux Corporation, Innolux Corporation, and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.'s unopposed motions for leave to intervene,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motions for leave to intervene are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.
FOR THE COURT
_________________
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: John C. O'Quinn , Esq.
Steven P. Hollman, Esq
Ron E. Shulman, Esq.
Frank H. Morgan, Esq.
Jia Chen, Esq.
s24