From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Varano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1479 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1479

08-29-2012

MR. BRIAN K. THOMPSON v. MR. DAVID A. VARANO, et al


ORDER

NOW, this 28th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 5), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Document No. 7) and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 17) and petitioner's supplemental objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 20), and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

_______________

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Varano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1479 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Thompson v. Varano

Case Details

Full title:MR. BRIAN K. THOMPSON v. MR. DAVID A. VARANO, et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1479 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2012)