From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Tonasket

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 2, 1973
487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-1193.

November 2, 1973.

Kelly Hancock, Omak, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert L. Pirtle, Ziontz, Pirtle Morisset, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; William N. Goodwin, Chief Judge.

Before KOELSCH, DUNIWAY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.


This case presents the same jurisdictional question as was presented in the case of Laramie v. Nicholson, 9 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 315. As in that case, the trial judge held that he had no jurisdiction and dismissed the action. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Laramie v. Nicholson, supra, and of Johnson v. The Lower Elwha Tribal Community, 9 Cir., 1973, 484 F.2d 200.

As in the Laramie case, we express no opinion on the merits of the case because the trial court did not reach that question. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Tonasket

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 2, 1973
487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Thompson v. Tonasket

Case Details

Full title:ALICE M. THOMPSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MEL TONASKET ET AL., AS MEMBERS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 2, 1973

Citations

487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Howlett v. Salish and Kootenai Tribes

484 F.2d at 202-03. Accord, Thompson v. Tonasket, 487 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1973); Laramie v. Nicholson, 487…

Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. United States

However, the courts which have considered the question have held that 28 U.S.C. § 1343(4) provides a remedy…