From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Stroup

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 3, 2021
C21-5632 BHS-TLF (W.D. Wash. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

C21-5632 BHS-TLF

12-03-2021

DREW THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. STROUP, CHERYL STRANGE, KATYANNA GREEN, E BURT, Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee as ordered by the Court. Dkt. 2. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Mathews, Sec'y of H.E.W. v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Local Rule MJR 4. For the reasons discussed below, the Court recommends that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for nonpayment of the filing fee.

DISCUSSION

Satisfaction of the filing fee-either through payment or through a grant of in forma pauperis (IFP) status-is a required prerequisite to filing a complaint. Here, plaintiff had filed his proposed complaint on August 30, 2021 and was notified on August 31 that his complaint was deficient. Dkt. 2. Plaintiff was instructed to either pay the filing fee or submit an application for IFP by September 30, 2021. The Court has not received either.

Because the dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff would be allowed to re-file his lawsuit and, at that time, pay the filing fee or submit an application for IFP. Although a dismissal without prejudice allows plaintiff an opportunity to re-file this complaint (or a different complaint), the Court is required to screen such a complaint and must “dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint: (1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 1998). If plaintiff chooses to re-file his complaint, it will be screened and, if found frivolous, malicious, or if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the new complaint may be dismissed.

CONCLUSION

The undersigned recommends that the Court dismiss plaintiff's complaint without prejudice, because he has failed to file a motion to proceed IFP; he has also failed to pay the filing fee.

The parties have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections thereto. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FRCP 72(b); see also FRCP 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the above time limit, the Clerk shall set this matter for consideration on December 3, 2021, as noted in the caption.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Stroup

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 3, 2021
C21-5632 BHS-TLF (W.D. Wash. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Thompson v. Stroup

Case Details

Full title:DREW THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. STROUP, CHERYL STRANGE, KATYANNA GREEN, E…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

C21-5632 BHS-TLF (W.D. Wash. Dec. 3, 2021)