From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 11, 1994
640 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-3452.

August 11, 1994.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County; Jere Tolton, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant, a juvenile, was convicted of battery and sentenced as an adult. Appellant contends that the trial court did not meet the requirements of section 39.059(7), Fla. Stat. (1993), in imposing adult sanctions because the trial court did not address all of the statutory criteria and the trial court did not enter a written order containing findings of fact and the reasons for imposing adult sanctions. We must reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7) and Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla. 1993) (trial court must consider each of criteria of section 39.059(7)(c), and must provide written findings and reasons at the time of sentencing).

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

JOANOS, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 11, 1994
640 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 11, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

White v. State

We must, therefore, reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with the dictates of Troutman v. State,…