From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 2006
932 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC06-248.

May 18, 2006.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief he seeks, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 2006
932 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD L. THOMPSON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 18, 2006

Citations

932 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 2006)