From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1987
508 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-1639.

June 3, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, M. William Graybill, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and W.H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph R. Bryant, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Michael Vincent Thompson appeals his sentence resulting from his conviction for robbery and kidnapping and also appeals the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 943.25(4), 943.25(8), and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985).

We have considered appellant's claim that the trial court erred in sentencing him and find that it is without merit. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, because the costs were assessed without notice and opportunity to be heard, we strike the costs without prejudice to the state to reassess the costs upon notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Burrow v. State, 487 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

FRANK, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1987
508 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL VINCENT THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 3, 1987

Citations

508 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. State

The record does not reflect that the judge imposed these costs at sentencing, nor that Campbell was given…