Opinion
No. 48A02-0606-CR-456.
March 28, 2007.
ORDER
The Court issued its Memorandum Decision in this appeal on December 14, 2006. The Court reversed Ernest Thompson's aggregate seventy-year sentence. Specifically, the Court reversed "Thompson's forty-year sentence imposed on count six and reduce[d] it to the advisory term of thirty years, to be served consecutive to the thirty-year term imposed on count two, for an aggregate term of sixty years." See Thompson v. State, Cause No. 48A02-0606-CR-456, at 8-9 (Ind.Ct.App. December 14, 2006).
It has come to the Court's attention that the trial court had imposed the forty-year sentence on count seven, not count six, and that the Memorandum Decision's references to count six were scrivener's errors. Because the trial court only sentenced Thompson to a forty-year sentence on one of the counts, it should be clear to which count the Court's Memorandum Decision is directed, and the scrivener's errors do not have any material impact on the outcome. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to clarify the matter.
The Court having examined this matter, now FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: All references in the Court's December 14, 2006 Memorandum Decision to count six should be considered as references to count seven.
ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2007.
All panel members concur.