From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 26, 1925
104 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 202.

May 26, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; Arthur E. Gamble, Judge. Violating prohibition law.

Bradshaw Barnett, of Florence, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


It would serve no good purpose to set out in detail the evidence in this case. We have read and considered the testimony, and find the case of the state amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The affirmative charge was properly refused, and the other charges gave undue prominence to certain facts testified to by the defendant's witnesses. The defendant has had a fair trial, and, no error being apparent on the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 26, 1925
104 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ernest THOMPSON, alias Thomas, v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 26, 1925

Citations

104 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
104 So. 926