¶47. When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we apply a de novo standard of review. Thompson v. State, 302 So.3d 1230, 1233 (¶6) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (citing Sanford v. State, 247 So.3d 1242, 1244 (¶10) (Miss. 2018)).
For the jury to find him guilty as an accessory after the fact to murder, the State had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that "(1) a completed felony has been committed; (2) . . . the accused concealed, received, relieved, aided or assisted a felon, knowing that such person had committed a felony; and (3) . . . such aid or assistance was rendered with intent to enable such felon to escape or avoid arrest, trial, conviction or punishment after the commission of such felony." Thompson v. State, 302 So.3d 1230, 1233-34 (¶7) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (emphasis added).
Id. (quoting Thompson v. State, 302 So. 3d 1230, 1234 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)).
Those decisions belong solely to the jury." Id. (quoting Thompson v. State, 302 So. 3d 1230, 1234 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)).
Those decisions belong solely to the jury." Id. (quoting Thompson v. State, 302 So.3d 1230, 1234 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)).
Those decisions belong solely to the jury." Thompson v. State , 302 So. 3d 1230, 1234 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (quoting Little v. State , 233 So. 3d 288, 289 (¶1) (Miss. 2017) ).
Those decisions belong solely to the jury." Thompson v. State , 302 So. 3d 1230, 1234 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (quoting Little v. State , 233 So. 3d 288, 289 (¶1) (Miss. 2017) ). ¶29.
Those decisions belong solely to the jury." Thompson v. State , 302 So. 3d 1230, 1234 (¶11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (quoting Little v. State , 233 So. 3d 288, 289 (¶1) (Miss. 2017) ).
¶23. "[A]n accessory-after-the-fact has been defined as ‘a person assisting one who has completed the commission of a felony to avoid being apprehended, arrested, convicted, etc.’ " Thompson v. State , 302 So. 3d 1230, 1233 (¶7) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (quoting Bailey v. State , 960 So. 2d 583, 590 (¶30) (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) ).