Summary
rejecting petitioner's claims that use of immunized testimony and inaccurate confidential information in parole decision violated due process rights
Summary of this case from Bratton v. HillOpinion
No. SA CV 15-415-CAS (PLA)
06-24-2015
MICHAEL THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN SOTO, Warden, Respondent.
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recom mendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted.
2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order.
3. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. DATED: June 24, 2015
/s/_________
HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE