From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Ruthart

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 5, 2023
Civil Action 4:23-cv-185-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:23-cv-185-O-BP

04-05-2023

DOYCE WILLIAMS THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES D. RUTHART, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REED O'CONNOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Doyce Williams Thompson's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Therefore, Ms. Thompson is instructed to pay the civil filing fee of $402.00 on or before April 21, 2023 or her case will be dismissed without prejudice, meaning she may refile the case at a later date if she chooses.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Ruthart

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 5, 2023
Civil Action 4:23-cv-185-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Thompson v. Ruthart

Case Details

Full title:DOYCE WILLIAMS THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES D. RUTHART, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Apr 5, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:23-cv-185-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2023)