From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Rite Aid Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 19, 2021
21-cv-03735-NC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-03735-NC

08-19-2021

CARL THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and others, Defendants.


ORDER TO CONSENT OR DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 18, 2021, Plaintiff brought this ADA action against Defendants. ECF 1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), all parties must consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in order for the magistrate judge to exercise jurisdiction over a civil action. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Plaintiff and Defendants Leonard Steven Marinello, Toni Ann Dimiceli, Leo. I. Picollo, and August J. Picollo timely consented to this Court's jurisdiction. ECF 6; ECF 13. After setting aside the default entered against Defendant Rite Aid Corporation, the Court reminded Rite Aid to consent or decline jurisdiction by August 18, 2021. ECF 17; ECF 18. As of August 19, 2021, Rite Aid has not responded. The Court now ORDERS Rite Aid to consent or decline the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge by August 26, 2021, or the Court will request that this case be reassigned to a District Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Rite Aid Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 19, 2021
21-cv-03735-NC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Thompson v. Rite Aid Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CARL THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and others, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 19, 2021

Citations

21-cv-03735-NC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021)