Thompson v. Quiros

3 Citing cases

  1. Thompson v. Martin

    CIVIL 3:21-CV-00262 (MEG) (D. Conn. Oct. 31, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    An Initial Review Order (“IRO”) issued on November 15, 2021, permitting Plaintiff's “Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim [to] proceed against Robert Martin in his individual capacity for money damages and in his official capacity for injunctive relief.” Thompson v. Quiros, No. 3:21-CV-00262 (JAM), 2021 WL 5301240, at *6 (D. Conn. Nov. 15, 2021).

  2. Gibbs v. Utilization Review Comm.

    3:20-cv-1119 (JAM) (D. Conn. Sep. 8, 2022)

    The defendants' motion to dismiss does not address the state law claim, and there is otherwise no need for me to address the state law claim for purposes of an initial review order. See Thompson v. Quiros, 2021 WL 5301240, at *3 n.48 (D. Conn. 2021). I will summarize the somewhat lengthy allegations of the second amended complaint.

  3. McLean v. City of New Haven

    3:21-cv-552 (JAM) (D. Conn. May. 23, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 439 (1985). As relevant here, “[t]o state an equal protection claim, a plaintiff must allege facts showing that: (1) he was treated differently from similarly situated individuals and (2) that the difference in or discriminatory treatment was based on ‘impermissible considerations such as race.'” Thompson v. Quiros, 2021 WL 5301240, at *5 (D. Conn. 2021) (quoting Diesel v. Town of Lewisboro, 232 F.3d 92, 103 (2d Cir. 2000)).