From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Pizzaro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

4889.

11-02-2017

Isaac THOMPSON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert PIZZARO, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Wade Clark Mulcahy, New York (Christopher J. Soverow of counsel), for appellants, William Schwitzer & Associates, P.C., New York (Howard R. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.


Wade Clark Mulcahy, New York (Christopher J. Soverow of counsel), for appellants,

William Schwitzer & Associates, P.C., New York (Howard R. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered June 22, 2016, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff satisfied his prima facie burden by submitting photographic evidence of the accident site and an affidavit in which he averred that while turning right from a designated lane, defendants' vehicle, which had been in the lane to the immediate left of plaintiff, turned wide to the right, entered plaintiff's lane, and collided with his car. Unless refuted or excused, defendants' actions violated Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1128(a) and 1163(a), establishing negligence (see Delgado v. Martinez Family Auto, 113 A.D.3d 426, 427, 979 N.Y.S.2d 277 [1st Dept.2014] ).

In opposition to plaintiff's prima facie showing, defendants failed to submit any evidence to raise a triable issue of fact, and instead relied solely upon the pleadings and the arguments of counsel. Since counsel claimed no personal knowledge of the accident, his affirmation has no probative value ( Bendik v. Dybowski, 227 A.D.2d 228, 229, 642 N.Y.S.2d 284 [1st Dept.1996] ).

Plaintiff's motion was not premature. Depositions are unnecessary, since defendants have personal knowledge of the facts, yet "failed to meet their obligation of laying bare their proof and presenting evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact" ( Avant v. Cepin Livery Corp., 74 A.D.3d 533, 534, 904 N.Y.S.2d 381 [1st Dept.2010] ).

TOM, J.P., RENWICK, MAZZARELLI, OING, SINGH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Pizzaro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Thompson v. Pizzaro

Case Details

Full title:Isaac THOMPSON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert PIZZARO, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 2, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7693

Citing Cases

Seda v. Joseph

"Depositions are unnecessary [before the court determines the liability motion], since [the parties] have…

Villafuerte v. Lopresti

A plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability was properly granted, where, as here, in…