From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 1, 2024
4:24-cv-00305-LPR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00305-LPR

11-01-2024

ZAYZHON THOMPSON ADC #162920 PETITIONER v. DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Doc. 14) and the Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 17). After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the Objections and the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Mr. Thompson insists in both his Petition and his Objections that he is attempting to challenge his 2023 Lincoln County conviction in Case No. 40CR-21-39 for possessing a cell phone while incarcerated, rather than challenging his 2016 Pulaski County conviction. Petition (Doc. 2) at 18-19; Objections (Doc. 17) at 1. All of the arguments he raises in his Petition, however, are premised on the invalidity of his original 2016 conviction. See RD (Doc. 14) at 3. Thus, the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider his successive Petition without authorization from the Eighth Circuit.

Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November 2024.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 1, 2024
4:24-cv-00305-LPR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Thompson v. Payne

Case Details

Full title:ZAYZHON THOMPSON ADC #162920 PETITIONER v. DEXTER PAYNE, Director…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 1, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00305-LPR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2024)