From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-1136-M (W.D. Okla. Jun. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-09-1136-M.

June 25, 2010


ORDER


On April 30, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and petitioner's request for expansion of the record and for evidentiary hearing be denied. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 21, 2010. After receiving an extension of time, petitioner filed his objections on June 1, 2010.

In his objections, petitioner objects to the entirety of the Report and Recommendation. Having carefully reviewed this matter de novo, the Court finds, for substantially the same reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, that petitioner's objections are without merit and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and petitioner's request for an expansion of the record and an evidentiary hearing should be denied.

Accordingly, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 30, 2010;
(2) DENIES petitioner's Request for Expansion of the Record and for Evidentiary Hearing [docket no. 5];
(3) DENIES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and
(4) ORDERS that judgment in favor of respondent issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-1136-M (W.D. Okla. Jun. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Thompson v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PAT THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID PARKER, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 25, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-09-1136-M (W.D. Okla. Jun. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Morris v. State

53. Doe v. Liberatore, 478 F.Supp.2d 742, 749–50, 761–63 (M.D.Pa.2007). 54. Morris v. Suthers, 246 F.Supp.2d…