From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Palladino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 1937
250 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

March 19, 1937.


Appellants had verdicts in the City Court of Albany, which were set aside and their complaints dismissed. The Albany County Court has affirmed such judgments and orders. This appeal is from the County Court decision. The plaintiff Amelia J. Thompson fell upon an outdoor smooth tile platform at the entrance to defendant's place of business. This platform was at the base of stairs which drained thereon; it sloped to a drain in the center. The accident happened on a rainy day. A mat which had covered the platform for many years was not in place on the day of the accident. On other occasions when plaintiff visited defendant's place of business the mat was in place. Order and judgment of the City Court of Albany and the Albany County Court are reversed, on the law and facts, and the verdicts reinstated, with costs in all courts. Hill, P.J., Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes and McNamee, JJ., dissent, and vote to affirm, on the authority of Antenen v. N.Y. Telephone Co. ( 271 N.Y. 558) ; Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Inc. (262 id. 107); Kraus v. Wolf (253 id. 300); Curtiss v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. (233 id. 554, revg. 194 App. Div. 931).


Summaries of

Thompson v. Palladino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 1937
250 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Thompson v. Palladino

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA J. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. FRANK A. PALLADINO, Respondent. STANLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Traub v. Progress Country Club, Inc.

We think there is less reason to apprehend danger in the present case, or to justify a finding of negligence…

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

Other decisions, however, to some extent, have relaxed the rule in the presence of special circumstances. (…