From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Orange and Rockland Electric Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.


Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Under subdivision 5 of rule 107, Rules of Civil Practice, should defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint have been granted?


Summaries of

Thompson v. Orange and Rockland Electric Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Thompson v. Orange and Rockland Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:ALEX THOMPSON, Respondent, v. ORANGE AND ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)