From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Lancaster

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 15, 1984
458 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1421.

November 15, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Volusia County; Kim C. Hammond, Judge.

Ronald K. Zimmet, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Charles L. Carlton of Carlton Carlton, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

COBB, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, J., dissents with opinion.


I respectfully dissent. In view of the fact that the parties agreed thirteen years ago that the husband would not have to pay any more child support in exchange for his agreement to stay away from the child, which he has done, I would reverse the award of arrearages. See Panganiban v. Panganiban, 396 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Warrick v. Hender, 198 So.2d 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). But see Armour v. Allen, 377 So.2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).


Summaries of

Thompson v. Lancaster

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 15, 1984
458 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Thompson v. Lancaster

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE B. THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. DOROTHY M. LANCASTER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 15, 1984

Citations

458 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State, Dept. of H R

For these reasons, we reverse, and remand for a new trial. We do not need to distinguish Thompson v.…

Hicks v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla.

AIIC’s motion exemplifies the wisdom of the rule that such per curiam affirmed decisions without a written…