From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Johnston

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 1938
94 F.2d 355 (9th Cir. 1938)

Opinion

No. 8714.

March 11, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Adolphus F. St. Sure, Judge.

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus by George Thompson against James A. Johnston, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz Island, California. From an order denying the issuance of the writ, petitioner appeals.

Affirmed.

George Thompson, in pro. per.

Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., and A.J. Zirpoli, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.


The United States District Court (Northern District of California) denied the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus upon appellant's petition, hence this appeal by him.

Petitioner is restrained of his liberties by virtue of conviction and sentence upon three indictment charges. His only point is that he was convicted and sentenced to prison, where he is now restrained of his liberties, upon a conspiracy charge, which is not of itself a crime since the scheme to violate a federal law was actually accomplished and petitioner was convicted and sentenced to prison upon the substantive offense.

We need but quote one sentence from Parmagini v. United States, 1930, 9 Cir., 42 F.2d 721, 725: "The last count of conspiracy to violate these laws is a separate and distinct offense punishable as such. Ader v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 284 F. 13; Brady v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 24 F.2d 405, 59 A.L.R. 563." 18 U.S.C.A. § 88.

The ruling of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Johnston

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 1938
94 F.2d 355 (9th Cir. 1938)
Case details for

Thompson v. Johnston

Case Details

Full title:THOMPSON v. JOHNSTON, Warden

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 1938

Citations

94 F.2d 355 (9th Cir. 1938)

Citing Cases

Rouse v. State

The appellant concedes expressly that former jeopardy would not prevent his conviction in the present case,…

Harrison v. King

The conspiracy charged in the 31st count of the indictment was a conspiracy to commit offenses against that…