From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Inman

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Jul 6, 2023
6:22-cv-01665-MK (D. Or. Jul. 6, 2023)

Opinion

6:22-cv-01665-MK

07-06-2023

RANDY THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. WALKER P. INMAN, III, Defendant.


ORDER

MICHAEL McSHANE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 40), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 40) is adopted in full. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 27) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Inman

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Jul 6, 2023
6:22-cv-01665-MK (D. Or. Jul. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Thompson v. Inman

Case Details

Full title:RANDY THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. WALKER P. INMAN, III, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Jul 6, 2023

Citations

6:22-cv-01665-MK (D. Or. Jul. 6, 2023)