From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Hill

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 27, 2013
2:13-cv-2618 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2013)

Opinion


ALLEN C. THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, Respondent. No. 2:13-cv-2618 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 27, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:


Summaries of

Thompson v. Hill

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 27, 2013
2:13-cv-2618 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Thompson v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN C. THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 27, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-2618 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2013)