From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Gorcyca

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 7, 2021
20-cv-10727 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 7, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-10727

10-07-2021

EDWARD THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. LISA O. GORCYCA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 44)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 16, 2021, the Court issued an order that (1) overruled Plaintiff Edward Thompson's objections (ECF No. 35) to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 33); (2) dismissed Thompson's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; (3) vacated the Clerk's entry of default (ECF No. 27) against Defendant Jennifer Paine; (4) terminated Thompson's motion for a default judgment (ECF No. 37) as moot; and (5) terminated Thompson's motion for a temporary restraining order and/or permanent injunction (ECF No. 39) as moot. (See Order, ECF No. 41.) Thompson has now moved for reconsideration. (See Mot., ECF No. 44.) The Court has carefully reviewed Thompson's motion and concludes that he is not entitled to relief because he has not shown that the Court committed any error. Accordingly, Thompson's motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

Thompson filed two identical copies of his motion for reconsideration. (See ECF Nos. 43, 44.) This order applies to both filings.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 7, 2021, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Gorcyca

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 7, 2021
20-cv-10727 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Thompson v. Gorcyca

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. LISA O. GORCYCA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 7, 2021

Citations

20-cv-10727 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 7, 2021)