From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Erdos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 3, 2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-770 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-770

01-03-2017

GERALD THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiff, v. MR. ERDOS, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 16)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 30, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 16). Defendant Gerald Thompson filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on December 16, 2016. (Doc. 17)

The Court has reviewed Defendant's objections and finds them to be without merit. Defendant's objections are, like his Complaint, rambling and difficult to decipher, and they appear generally to reassert the same claims raised in the Complaint. Nowhere in his objections does Defendant Thompson address the substantive and procedural deficiencies with his Complaint identified in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, a complete adoption of the Report and Recommendation is appropriate. --------

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly:

1. Plaintiffs Huddleston and Smith are DISMISSED from this civil action for lack of prosecution;

2. Plaintiff Gerald Thompson's complaint (Doc. 1), as amended (Doc. 7), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1);

3. Plaintiff Gerald Thompson's remaining motions (Docs. 5, 6, 10, 18) are DENIED as moot;

4. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED in this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 1/3/2017

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thompson v. Erdos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 3, 2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-770 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Thompson v. Erdos

Case Details

Full title:GERALD THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiff, v. MR. ERDOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 3, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-770 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Esham

Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 315 (3rd Cir. 2001) (en banc). Plaintiff/appellant's complaints in the…