From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Dr. Miracle's, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 22, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-562-JJB-DLD (M.D. La. Oct. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-562-JJB-DLD

10-22-2012

DELORIS THOMPSON v. DR. MIRACLE'S, INC., ET AL


ORDER

The court sua sponte notes the potential insufficiency of the removing defendants' allegation of the citizenship of the parties in their notice of removal as follows; 1. ___ A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must allege the citizenship rather than mere residence of an individual. In addition, see 28 U.S.C. §1332(c)(2) for infants, minors and an incompetent. The citizenship of _________________ is not provided. 2. X A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must allege both the state of incorporation and principal place of business of each corporate party. See, e.g., Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co. v. Pargas, Inc., 706 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1983). The state of incorporation and principal place of business of BMC 1092, Inc. and SoLab, Inc. is not provided. 3. ___ A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must allege both the state of incorporation and principal place of business of each corporate party. See, e.g., Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co. v. Pargas, Inc., 706 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1983). Even when a liability insurer takes on its insured's citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1) , its own citizenship still is considered in determining whether complete diversity exists. The state of incorporation and principal place of business of _________________ is not provided. 4. ___ A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must properly allege the citizenship of a limited liability company. The citizenship of a limited liability company for diversity purposes is determined by the citizenship of its members. The citizenship of all of the members of a limited liability company must be properly alleged. In the event a member of a limited liability company is another limited liability company, the members of that limited liability company must be properly alleged as well. is See Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 542 F.3d 1077, 1080 (5th Cir. 2008). The complete citizenship of _________________ is not provided. 5. ___ A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must properly allege the citizenship of a general partnership, a limited liability partnership, and a limited partnership. A general partnership, a limited liability partnership, and a limited partnership has the citizenship of each one of its partners. Both the general partner and limited partner must be alleged to establish citizenship of a limited partnership. See International Paper Co. v. Denkmann Assoc., 116 F.3d 134, 137 (5th Cir. 1997); Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 110 S.Ct. 1014, 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990). The citizenship of _________________is not provided. 6. ___ A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must properly allege the citizenship of Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. The citizenship of Underwriters at Lloyd's, London has not been provided. See Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073, 124 S.Ct. 2421, 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004). 7. ___ A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must properly allege the citizenship of a sole proprietorship. A business entity cannot be both a corporation and sole proprietorship; therefore the court seeks to clarify the identity of plaintiff/defendant. Case law suggests that the citizenship of a sole proprietorship for diversity purposes is determined by the citizenship of its members and/or owners. See Linder Enterprises v. Martinringle, 2007 WL 3095382 (N.D. Tex.). The citizenship of _________________ is not provided.

The phrase "principal place of business" in §1332(c)(1) refers to the place where a corporation's high level officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities, i.e., its "nerve center," which will typically be found at its corporate headquarters. Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 130 S.Ct. 1181, 175 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2010)

See footnote 1.
--------

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1653, that, on or before November 6, 2012, the removing defendants shall file an amended notice of removal providing the citizenship of defendants, BMC 1092, Inc. and SoLab, Inc., by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federal diversity jurisdiction.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. on October 22, 2012.

_________________

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOCIA L. DALBY


Summaries of

Thompson v. Dr. Miracle's, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 22, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-562-JJB-DLD (M.D. La. Oct. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Thompson v. Dr. Miracle's, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DELORIS THOMPSON v. DR. MIRACLE'S, INC., ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 22, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-562-JJB-DLD (M.D. La. Oct. 22, 2012)