From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Deschutes Cnty. Planners

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 23, 2023
Civ. 6:21-cv-1296-MK (D. Or. Feb. 23, 2023)

Opinion

Civ. 6:21-cv-1296-MK

02-23-2023

RONDALD RAY THOMPSON; and RACHEL ANN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNERS, et al. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#19), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (#19) is adopted. This action is DISMISSED.

Plaintiffs filed a brief stating that they had no objection to the F&R. ECF No. 21.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Deschutes Cnty. Planners

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 23, 2023
Civ. 6:21-cv-1296-MK (D. Or. Feb. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Thompson v. Deschutes Cnty. Planners

Case Details

Full title:RONDALD RAY THOMPSON; and RACHEL ANN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. DESCHUTES…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Feb 23, 2023

Citations

Civ. 6:21-cv-1296-MK (D. Or. Feb. 23, 2023)