From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 1966
25 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

May 19, 1966


Judgment granting judgment in favor of defendants City of New York and Angelo Rodriguez, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the verdict of the jury, which found the afore-mentioned defendants liable to the plaintiff, is reinstated with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The plaintiff in this action was injured when he was hit by a stray bullet fired in a gun battle involving the defendant Policeman Rodriguez, his partner Jones, and a felon who was attempting to escape from the scene of a robbery. In the main, the case presents two issues of fact to be determined by the jury, i.e., (1) whether the plaintiff was hit by a bullet from the gun of the police officer Rodriguez, and (2) whether Rodriguez was negligent in the manner in which he discharged his gun. The questions were fairly presented, and the charge properly gave the issues to the jury. The verdict of the jury was supported by the evidence presented and, therefore, it was error to set aside the jury's verdict, and, accordingly, the verdict is reinstated. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Thompson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 1966
25 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Thompson v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JAMES THOMPSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 19, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Herndon v. City of Ithaca

On both theories asserted by Herndon, the issues of legality of the arrest, the manner in which the attempted…