From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. City of Harrisburg

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 11, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0840 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 11, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0840.

September 11, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2007, upon consideration of the motion to deem timely filed the responsive pleading of defendants George Sullivan and Arlie Gibson (Doc. 8), and of the order of court dated August 24, 2007 (Doc. 13), advising plaintiffs that the motion would be deemed unopposed if plaintiffs failed to show cause why it should not be granted on or before September 4, 2007, and it appearing that plaintiffs have not filed such a response as of the date of this order, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 8) is GRANTED.
2. The responsive pleading filed by defendants George Sullivan and Arlie Gibson (Doc. 9) is DEEMED timely filed.


Summaries of

Thompson v. City of Harrisburg

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 11, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0840 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 11, 2007)
Case details for

Thompson v. City of Harrisburg

Case Details

Full title:MARJORIE THOMPSON JOHN THOMPSON, Plaintiffs v. CITY OF HARRISBURG, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 11, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0840 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 11, 2007)