Opinion
2:19-cv-02578-MCE-DMC
08-13-2021
MATTHEW A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICO, BRENDAN OTTOBONI, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.
Jesse J. Maddox, Bar No. 219091, Megan E. Nevin, Bar No. 304122, LIEBERT CAS SIDY WHITMORE A Professional Law Corporation Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF CHICO and BRENDAN OTTOBONI
Complaint Filed: December 19, 2019
Jesse J. Maddox, Bar No. 219091, Megan E. Nevin, Bar No. 304122, LIEBERT CAS SIDY WHITMORE A Professional Law Corporation Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF CHICO and BRENDAN OTTOBONI
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' CITY OF CHICO AND BRENDAN OTTOBONI'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MORRISON C. ENGLAND JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Having considered he City of Chico's ("City") and Brandon Ottoboni's (collectively, "Defendants") Ex Parte Application to Exceed Page Limit for Motion for its Summary Judgment or in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 47, and good cause appearing, Defendants' Ex Parte Application to exceed the 20 page limitation in its Motion for Summary Judgment or in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.
Defendants may file a Memorandum of Points of Authorities no longer than 30 pages in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment or in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment.
Plaintiffs Opposition, if any, is also extended to 30 pages and Defendants' Reply shall not exceed 15 pages in length.
IT IS SO ORDERED.