From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1708 GEB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1708 GEB PAN P.

February 21, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 23, 2005, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has filed an opposition.

Respondent contends, inter alia, that petitioner has no federally protected liberty interest in parole under California law. To support that contention, respondent relies on an order of the district court in Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 376 F.Supp.2d 975 (E.D.Cal. 2005). The Sass case is set for oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on March 16, 2006. Good cause appearing, respondent's motion will be denied without prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, not later than thirty days after any decision by the court of appeals in Sass.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent's December 23, 2005 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1708 GEB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Thompson v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. THOMAS CAREY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1708 GEB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2006)