From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Booth

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 4, 2021
16-CV-03477 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2021)

Opinion

16-CV-03477 (PMH)

08-04-2021

KEVIN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. SGT. BOOTH, C.O., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

PHILIP M. HALPERN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Counsel for all parties appeared at The Hon. Charles L. Brieant Jr. Federal Building and Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, New York, in Courtroom 520 at 100 p.m. today. An evidentiary hearing was had on the record.

For the reasons indicated on the record and law cited therein, the Court found that Plaintiff failed to satisfy his burden of production to establish that the administrative grievance process was “unavailable” to him. Williams v. Priatno, 829 F.3d 118, 1232d Cir. 2016. Therefore, the Court found that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required under the Prison Litigation Reform Act “PLRA”.

Because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his remedies, this action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Salerno, Garnot, Jordan, and Vigna. The Court grants Plaintiff permission to seek a default judgment on liability with respect to Defendant Booth in accordance with this Court's Individual Practices. In doing so, Plaintiff must specify why it is permissible for this case to proceed with respect to Defendant Booth, despite the Court's finding that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under the PLRA. See transcript.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Booth

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 4, 2021
16-CV-03477 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Thompson v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. SGT. BOOTH, C.O., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

Citations

16-CV-03477 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2021)