From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 27, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-01376 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-01376

10-27-2017

ROBBIN LYNNE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Robbin Lynne Thompson's Complaint seeking review of the decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Nancy A. Berryhill ("Commissioner"). (ECF No. 2.) By Standing Order filed in this case on February 27, 2017, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition ("PF&R"). (ECF No. 4.) Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn filed his PF&R on September 15, 2017, recommending that this Court reverse the final decision of the Commissioner, remand this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and dismiss this action from the Court's docket. (ECF No. 20.)

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Plaintiff's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Objections to the PF&R were due on October 2, 2017. To date, no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request for judgment on the pleadings, (ECF No. 17), to the extent it seeks remand of the Commissioner's decision, DENIES Defendant's request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner, (ECF No. 18), REVERSES the final decision of the Commissioner, REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the PF&R, (ECF No. 20), DISMISSES the Complaint, (ECF No. 2), and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: October 27, 2017

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thompson v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 27, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-01376 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Thompson v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:ROBBIN LYNNE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 27, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-01376 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2017)

Citing Cases

Greer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Without a physician "describing the circumstances for which [the cane] is needed," the ALJ could not have…

Darlene W. v. Kijakazi

That was well within the ALJ's power to do. See, e.g., Hughes v. Berryhill, 2017 WL 4854112, at *14 (S.D.…