From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Bernstein

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 20, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-440J (W.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-440J.

December 20, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 29, 2005, docket no. 2, recommending that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a federal claim, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2) (B), without prejudice to plaintiff pursuing any state law claims in the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County.

The plaintiff was notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), he had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff has filed miscellaneous papers which could be construed as objections, but which do not contain any reason not to adopt the Report and Recommendation.

After de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation, and plaintiff's responses thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2005, it is ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a federal claim. Plaintiff may file any complaint he wishes containing state law claims in the appropriate state court. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Bernstein

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 20, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-440J (W.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Thompson v. Bernstein

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. TAMMARA BERNSTEIN and J. KASABACK…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 20, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-440J (W.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2005)